Findapeach.com — Original Research

The 2026 Global OnlyFans
Models Report

Where are OnlyFans creators really based? A country-by-country and city-by-city analysis of creator counts, population-adjusted density rankings, and what the global distribution of a $7.22 billion platform actually looks like.

100
Countries Ranked
100
Top Cities
$7.22B
Annual Revenue
The 25 Most Active International Countries Revealed
Map Image
1USA
2UK
3Colombia
4Canada
5Argentina
6Australia
7Spain
8Germany
9Italy
10France
11Chile
12Thailand
13Ukraine
14Venezuela
15Sweden
16Netherlands
17South Africa
18Romania
19New Zealand
20Finland
21Peru
22Poland
23Ecuador
24Norway
25Portugal
Top 25 International Cities Dominating OnlyFans
Map Image
1Los Angeles
2New York City
3London
4Atlanta
5Las Vegas
6Miami
7Chicago
8Houston
9Dallas
10Mexico City
11Medellin
12Buenos Aires
13São Paulo
14Bogotá
15Toronto
16Seattle
17Madrid
18Paris
19Barcelona
20Philadelphia
21Washington Dc
22San Diego
23Melbourne
24Austin
25Portland

Introduction

At Findapeach.com, we operate at the intersection of data science and adult content. As one of the leading metasearch engines for OnlyFans and their over 400 million monthly visitors, we focus on the platform's most active creators - a number closer to 682,000 who are regularly publishing and monetizing their work. This unique position gives us a front-row view of both the creator and consumer sides of the industry.

With an estimated $7.22 billion generated annually on the platform, a key question emerges: Where are creators really based, and which countries and cities truly punch above their weight when adjusted for adult population?

For this study, we analyzed over half a million active OnlyFans profiles across 100 countries and the world's top 100 creator cities to rank locations by two metrics: raw creator count and creators per 100,000 adults. The findings reveal clear global hubs alongside some surprising overperformers.


How We Built the Dataset

The dataset combines our proprietary scraper (which continuously crawls OnlyFans for creator data) with a third-party export of verified profiles. We applied strict inclusion criteria for active accounts: login activity within the last 6 months, at least 5 posts or media items, and no inactive or closed status. This means the dataset represents creators who are actively trying to generate revenue on the platform - not every account ever registered. Free-text locations were cleaned and standardized (e.g., "Chicago" becomes Chicago; whimsical entries like "Hogwarts" or "North Pole" are marked Unknown).

City-level entries are validated against a master reference database to ensure only genuine cities appear in the rankings - territories, regions, and vague descriptors are excluded. Comparisons use metro-area populations (sourced from Macrotrends) rather than strict city limits, as creators typically self-identify with the nearest major hub (e.g., Evanston creators list "Chicago"; Fort Lauderdale creators often say "Miami"). Boroughs and satellite areas are aggregated into parent metros (e.g., Brooklyn merges into New York City). Where precise 18+ population data was unavailable, we estimated adult populations using UN/World Bank age-structure models.

The results provide the clearest publicly available snapshot to date of where OnlyFans creators are concentrated globally - both in absolute numbers and on a per-adult-population basis.


Instructions for Journalists

How to use this page:
  • This page covers two datasets: Country Analysis (100 countries) and Top 100 Global Cities (spanning 21 countries). For US-specific breakdowns by state and city, see Page 2.
  • Sort columns to compare creator count, creator density per 100,000 adults, average earnings, and how creator income compares to the local minimum wage.
  • The Country Analysis includes an agricultural export comparison - showing which real-world export industry generates comparable revenue to the local creator economy.
  • The Top 100 Global Cities table adds cost-of-living and purchasing power columns, letting you compare what creator earnings are actually worth in different cities.
  • All images in this study are free for you to use. PSDs of the images provided on request.

The Total Models figures in the tables below are extrapolated estimates that account for creators who don't list a location. The profile counts shown on individual Findapeach pages are observed (raw) counts. Both are valid - they answer different questions. For definitions, formulas, and caveats, see the Methodology section at the bottom of the page.

  • Total Models
    icon
  • Rankings By No. of Models
    icon
  • Rankings By Density
    icon
  • % of Performers Who are Female
    icon
  • % of Performers Who are Male
    icon
  • % of Performers Who are Trans
    icon
  • % of Performers Who are Male Gay
    icon
  • % of Performers Who are Female Lesbian
    icon
  • Average Price
    icon
  • Average No. of Followers (Per Model)
    icon
  • Average No. of Subscribers (Per Model)
    icon
  • Yearly OF Model Revenue ($M)
    icon
  • Avg Annual/Model ($)
    icon
  • Min Wage/Yr ($)
    icon
  • % Diff vs Yearly Min Wage
    icon
  • Comparable Agricultural Export(s) (2024)
    icon
  • Estimated Export Revenue ($M)
    icon
  • Export Year Used
    icon
  • Cost of Living (NYC=100)
    icon
  • Purchasing Power ($NYC)
    icon

International Results

Artwork-for-journalists
Artwork-for-journalists

Research Methodology

How the Data Works: Country Analysis & Top 100 Global Cities

A complete, plain-language explanation of every column in the Country Analysis and Top 100 Global Cities data - where each number originates, how it is calculated, and what it represents.

100
Countries in analysis
528K
Estimated total active models
$5.76B
Total creator revenue pool
icon
Raw Data
Source Data &
What Is Collected

The foundation of this study is a large proprietary dataset built from publicly visible OnlyFans profile fields. Importantly, this dataset does not include every account registered on OnlyFans. Only profiles that meet an activity threshold are included: a minimum of 5 posts, images, or videos published, and the account must have been active within the last 6 months. This filters out dormant, abandoned, or placeholder accounts and ensures the dataset reflects creators who are actively trying to generate revenue. There are significantly more accounts registered on OnlyFans than appear in this analysis, but those that do not pass this activity test are excluded.

For every qualifying profile, the following fields are recorded:

Field Name Type What It Captures
merged_location Raw The creator's self-reported location. Only a portion of profiles contain a usable value - this is the single most important constraint in the entire methodology.
gender Raw Gender is determined through automated image recognition applied to the model's profile image, combined with any gender-affirming statement present in the profile. Where a stated gender is available it takes precedence as the authoritative source.
price Raw Monthly subscription price in USD at the time the data was collected.
followers Raw Total follower count on the profile.
subscribers Raw Paying subscriber count - the primary monetisation signal.

Profiles are grouped by location. Entries that resolve to a country are used in the Country Analysis. Entries that resolve to a specific city (validated against a master city reference database) are used in the Top 100 Global Cities table. Entries resolving to state/province names, regional descriptions, territories, or other non-city terms are excluded from the cities table.

icon
Extrapolation
Scaling From Observed Profiles to Estimated Totals

Not every profile in the dataset contains a usable location field. To estimate the full creator population for each location, observed counts are scaled up using a coverage rate computed at runtime directly from the dataset - specifically, the proportion of all loaded profiles that have a non-empty location value.

Country-Level Extrapolation
Total Models = Observed Models ÷ Coverage Rate
// Coverage Rate = (rows with usable location) ÷ (total rows in dataset)
// Computed at runtime from the actual CSV data - not a hardcoded constant
Why City-Level Numbers Differ from Country-Level Numbers

You may notice that the Total Models figure shown on the site profile pages differs from the numbers in the country and city analysis tables. This is by design. The two datasets serve different purposes:

Observed vs. Extrapolated Counts

The profile counts shown on the site represent observed counts - the actual number of profiles in the dataset that list a given location. The figures in the Country Analysis and Top 100 Cities tables are extrapolated estimates that account for profiles without location data. For example, if 100,000 US profiles are observed but only ~55% of all profiles include a location, the extrapolated US total would be approximately 100,000 ÷ 0.55 ≈ 182,000. Both numbers are valid; they simply answer different questions.

City-Level Two-Stage Extrapolation

For the Top 100 Global Cities table, an additional correction is applied beyond the basic coverage factor. Many profiles include a location that resolves to a country or state (e.g. "United States > Florida") but not to a specific city. These profiles are correctly counted in the Country Analysis but cannot be attributed to any individual city.

To ensure that city-level totals roll up proportionally to the country-level totals, each city's count is scaled by a per-country specificity uplift:

City-Level Extrapolation (Two-Stage)
Coverage Rate = rows with location ÷ total rows
Uplift = country-located rows ÷ city-resolved rows for that country

City Total Models = Observed City Count ÷ Coverage Rate × Uplift

// Stage 1 corrects for profiles with no location at all
// Stage 2 corrects for profiles with country/state but no city
// Result: sum of city totals for a country ≈ that country's total
⚠ Key Assumption

Both stages of extrapolation assume that creators who omit location detail are distributed in the same proportions as those who provide it. If creators in any country or city are systematically more or less likely to list a detailed location, the corresponding estimates will be over- or under-stated.

icon
Revenue
Revenue Pool & Distribution

Revenue Pool
Total Platform Revenue (est.) = $7.2 Billion
Creator Share (80%) = $7.2B × 0.80 = $5.76 Billion
Distributing Revenue by Engagement

Rather than splitting revenue by creator count (which would assume all creators earn equally), revenue is distributed by an engagement score - a weighted combination of subscribers and followers that proxies each location's share of actual monetisation activity:

Engagement-Weighted Revenue Distribution
Engagement Score = (Est. Subscribers × 0.60) + (Est. Followers × 0.40)

Yearly Revenue (M USD) = (Location Score ÷ Global Total Score) × $5,760M

// Subscribers weighted 60% - direct paid relationships
// Followers weighted 40% - reach and potential monetisation
Average Annual Earnings Per Model
Avg Annual / Model ($)
Avg Annual / Model ($) = (Yearly Revenue × $1,000,000) ÷ Total Models
⚠ Averages vs. Reality

Creator earnings follow a highly skewed distribution. The Avg Annual / Model figure is an arithmetic mean pulled upward by a small number of very high earners. The median creator's actual income is considerably lower than the average shown.

icon
Rankings
Two Ways of Ranking: Size vs. Density

Ranking (No. Models)

Countries and cities ranked #1 downward by their estimated total creator count. This reflects absolute size - how many creators are based there. The US ranks #1 by this measure due to its large population.

Global Ranking (By Density)

Countries ranked by creators per 100,000 adult residents. This reflects cultural adoption - how common content creation is relative to population. Smaller English-speaking countries often rank highly here.

Note on Density Ranking

The Density ranking requires adult population data to calculate. Countries where population data was unavailable have no density rank. The two rankings together give a fuller picture than either alone.

City Population Data

For the Top 100 Global Cities table, city population figures are sourced from Macrotrends and use metropolitan area populations rather than city-centre-only figures. This is because creators tend to list the nearest major city as their location rather than the specific outer-suburban municipality they live in. A creator in Parramatta, for example, will typically list "Sydney" rather than a smaller local area name. Using metro populations ensures that density calculations reflect the realistic catchment area that each city name represents in the data.

icon
Demographics
Gender
Classification Logic

Gender classification uses automated image recognition applied to each model's profile photo, combined with any gender-affirming statement present in the profile. Where both signals are available, stated gender takes precedence as the authoritative source. Image recognition provides coverage where no gender is explicitly stated.

  1. Profiles identified as Trans - either through stated gender or image recognition - are classified first and excluded from subsequent steps.

  2. Remaining profiles identified as Male via stated gender or image recognition are classified as Male.

  3. All remaining profiles are classified as Female based on stated gender or image recognition output.

  4. Within Male profiles: those whose profile data contains the keyword "gay" are counted under % Male Gay. This is calculated as a share of all male profiles for that location.

  5. Within Female profiles: those whose profile data contains "lesbian" or "girl/girl" are counted under % Female Lesbian. This is a share of all female profiles for that location.

Format Note

In the Country Analysis sheet, gender percentages are stored as decimals (e.g. 0.8332 = 83.32%). In the Top 100 Cities sheet they are stored as direct percentages (e.g. 77.18 = 77.18%). Both represent the same underlying data.

icon
Profile Metrics
Average Price, Followers & Subscribers

For each country or city, averages are computed across all profiles in that group that have a non-null value for the relevant field. These are per-model averages, not platform-wide totals.

Column Label Definition
Avg Price / Month Mean monthly subscription price in USD across all profiles in the group with a non-null price.
Avg Followers (Per Model) Mean total follower count per profile. Followers include both paying and non-paying accounts.
Avg Subscribers (Per Model) Mean paying subscriber count per profile. This is the most direct signal of monetisation.
icon
Economic Context - Cities Only
Comparing Creator Earnings to Local Wages

The following three columns appear in the Top 100 Global Cities table only (they are not included in the Country Analysis sheet).

Min Wage / Yr ($)

Annual minimum wage figures in USD are sourced from government publications and international labour organisation records for each country. Where no statutory minimum wage exists (e.g. some Scandinavian countries), the wage floor established by national collective bargaining agreements is used as the reference. Monthly figures are multiplied by 12 to produce the annual amount shown.

% Diff vs Yearly Min Wage
% Difference vs. Yearly Minimum Wage
% Diff vs Yearly Min Wage = ((Avg Annual/Model − Annual Min Wage) ÷ Annual Min Wage) × 100

// Positive value → avg creator earns MORE than min wage
// Negative value → avg creator earns LESS than min wage
icon
Country Analysis Only
Comparable Agricultural Export Industry

For each country, the analysis identifies which real-world agricultural export industry generates annual revenue most comparable to the estimated creator economy. This puts the scale of content creator income into concrete, tangible terms.

Data Source

Agricultural export values are retrieved from the UN Comtrade database using 2024 data. Only products classified under HS Codes 01-24 are eligible - covering live animals, vegetable products, foodstuffs, beverages, and tobacco. Minerals, electronics, machinery, and manufactured goods are excluded.

Comparable Agricultural Export(s) (2024)

The name of the matching agricultural export industry or combination of industries. Where a single export industry's value falls within 10% of the country's OnlyFans revenue estimate, it is used as the match. Where no single export meets this threshold, the closest combination of agricultural exports is used. Names are abbreviated for readability (e.g. "Oilseeds, grains & medicinal plants" rather than the full Comtrade commodity description).

Estimated Export Revenue ($M)

The value of that export industry in millions USD, sourced from UN Comtrade. This is the figure the OnlyFans revenue estimate is being compared against.

icon
Top 100 Global Cities Only
Cost of Living & Purchasing Power Columns

The Top 100 Global Cities table adds two columns not present in the Country Analysis, providing city-level economic context for creator earnings.

Cost of Living (NYC=100)

Each city is assigned a cost-of-living index score, normalised so that New York City equals 100. A score of 50 means consumer prices are approximately half those of NYC. The index covers rent, food, transport, and services.

Purchasing Power ($NYC)
Purchasing Power Equivalent
Purchasing Power ($NYC) = Avg Annual/Model ($) × (100 ÷ Cost of Living Index)

// Example: $20,000 earned in a city with CoL index of 50
// = $20,000 × (100 ÷ 50) = $40,000 equivalent purchasing power in NYC
City Validation & Consolidation

Every candidate city token extracted from a location path is validated against a master city reference database (locations.csv, filtered to entries with location_type = city). Tokens that do not match a known city - including countries, territories, regions, sub-continents, and vague descriptors - are rejected. This prevents non-city entries (e.g. "Taiwan", "Antarctica", "Eastern Europe") from appearing in the results.

New York City borough entries (Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, Bronx, Staten Island) are merged into a single New York City record. Paris metropolitan sub-regions are consolidated into Paris. The resulting Top 100 spans 21 countries, with the US, UK, Canada, and Australia most heavily represented.

Reference

Complete Column Glossary


Country Analysis Sheet - 16 Columns
Column in Spreadsheet Type Description
Country Raw Country name as matched from profile location data
Total Models Extrapolated Estimated total creators from this country (observed ÷ coverage rate)
Ranking (No. Models) Calculated Rank by estimated total creator count; 1 = most creators
Global Ranking (By Density) Calculated Rank by creators per 100,000 adults; blank where population data unavailable
% Female Calculated Share of profiles classified as female (stored as decimal: 0.83 = 83%)
% Male Calculated Share classified as male, non-trans (decimal format)
% Trans Calculated Share with "trans" in gender field (decimal format)
% Male Gay Calculated Share of male profiles containing keyword "gay" (% of males)
% Female Lesbian Calculated Share of female profiles with "lesbian" or "girl/girl" (% of females)
Avg Price Raw Mean monthly subscription price in USD
Avg Followers (Per Model) Raw Mean follower count per profile
Avg Subscribers (Per Model) Raw Mean paying subscriber count per profile
Yearly Revenue (M USD) Calculated Estimated annual creator revenue from this country, in millions USD
Comparable Agricultural Export(s) (2024) Reference Agricultural export industry with revenue most comparable to OF creator economy (UN Comtrade, HS 01-24)
Estimated Export Revenue ($M) Reference Value of that export industry in millions USD
Export Year Used Reference Year of Comtrade data used for the comparison

Top 100 Global Cities Sheet - 19 Columns
Column in Spreadsheet Type Description
City Raw City name validated against master city reference database
Country Raw Country extracted from position in the location path hierarchy
Total Models Extrapolated Estimated total creators in this city (two-stage extrapolation)
Rank (Models) Calculated City rank by estimated creator count across all 100 cities
Rank (Density) Calculated City rank by creator density relative to city adult population
% Female / % Male / % Trans Calculated Gender breakdown as direct percentages (e.g. 77.18 = 77.18%)
% Male Gay / % Female Lesbian Calculated Keyword-based sub-category counts, as % of the relevant gender group
Avg Price Raw Mean monthly subscription price in USD
Avg Followers (Per Model) Raw Mean follower count per profile in this city
Avg Subscribers (Per Model) Raw Mean paying subscriber count per profile
Yearly OF Model Revenue ($M) Calculated Estimated annual creator revenue for this city, in millions USD
Avg Annual/Model ($) Calculated Estimated mean annual creator earnings in USD
Min Wage/Yr ($) Reference Annual minimum wage for the country this city is in (USD)
% Diff vs Yearly Min Wage Calculated Percentage difference between avg model earnings and annual minimum wage
Cost of Living (NYC=100) Reference City cost-of-living index; New York City = 100
Purchasing Power ($NYC) Calculated Avg annual creator earnings expressed as NYC purchasing-power equivalent

Limitations & Important Caveats


  • Extrapolated vs. observed counts. The Total Models figures in these tables are statistical estimates, not direct counts. They will be higher than the raw profile counts shown elsewhere on the site, which represent only the observed profiles with a usable location field. Both numbers are valid - they answer different questions.
  • Self-reporting bias. Creators choose whether to show a location. Those who do may differ from those who don't - for example, creators in places where adult content creation carries social risk may be less likely to display a location, potentially understating those countries' figures.
  • Mean vs. median. All earnings figures are arithmetic means across a strongly right-skewed distribution. A small number of very high-earning creators significantly raise the average. For most creators, actual earnings will be well below the reported average.
  • Revenue model assumptions. The $5.76B revenue pool and 80% creator share are estimates based on publicly available financial reporting. Changes in OnlyFans' fee structure or reporting practices could affect the accuracy of these base figures.
  • Static snapshot. The dataset reflects a specific point in time. Creator counts, earnings, and platform dynamics change continuously.
  • Gender classification limits. Gender is derived from image recognition and self-reported profile fields. Misclassification, particularly for non-binary or otherwise unlabelled profiles, is possible.
  • City validation gate. Only locations that match a known city in the reference database are included in the cities tables. Cities absent from the reference database are excluded even if they appear in profile data.
Sources

References & Data Sources


Source Used For Link
OnlyFans Publicly visible profile data (location, gender, price, followers, subscribers) onlyfans.com
UN Comtrade Database Agricultural export values by country (HS Codes 01-24, 2024 data) comtradeplus.un.org
World Bank Open Data Country population figures, adult population ratios, GDP per capita data.worldbank.org
Macrotrends City metropolitan area population figures (used for city density rankings) macrotrends.net
International Labour Organization (ILO) Minimum wage data by country ilostat.ilo.org
Numbeo Cost of living indices by city (NYC = 100 baseline) numbeo.com/cost-of-living
OnlyFans Financial Reporting Platform revenue estimates ($7.2B gross, 80% creator share) fenixintl.com (Companies House filings)